Las Vegas Family Sues Police After Rally Incident

Categories: Breaking NewsCrimeGovernment NewsNews

Community rally in Las Vegas highlighting discussions on police conduct.

News Summary

A Las Vegas family has filed a lawsuit against local police following an unsettling incident involving their son’s arrest at a Donald Trump rally. Vem Miller, who claimed to possess firearms legally, alleges defamation and rights violations after being detained. His parents, Berj and Sonia Yenovkian, have also sued the LVMPD for an unnecessary welfare check that they believe was a guise for police to enter their home. This situation has sparked community discussions about police conduct and regulations at public events.

Las Vegas Family Files Lawsuit Against Police Following Rally Incident

In a shocking turn of events, a family from Las Vegas has decided to take legal action against the local police department after a tense encounter related to their son’s recent arrest during a Donald Trump rally. Vem Miller, a Las Vegas resident and former candidate for the Nevada Assembly, made headlines last October when he traveled to Riverside County to attend the rally where he claimed to be a special guest of the Nevada Republican Party.

The Arrest That Sparked Controversy

The rally took a dramatic twist when authorities discovered firearms, including a Glock handgun and a shotgun, inside Miller’s vehicle. Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco stated that Miller’s detention ultimately thwarted what could have been a potential assassination attempt on Trump. However, Miller strongly denied these serious allegations, labeling them as untrue and damaging to his reputation. Following the incident, he filed a whopping $100 million lawsuit against Sheriff Bianco, alleging defamation and violations of his constitutional rights as a result of his arrest.

Understanding the Legal Background

Complicating matters further, Miller, who is known to carry firearms legally at such rallies, informed the police about his possession of the weapons at the time of his arrest. This brings to light the ongoing debate about gun rights and police conduct, especially at politically charged events.

A Family’s Distress

But the situation took another alarming turn when Vem Miller’s parents, Berj and Sonia Yenovkian, filed a separate lawsuit against the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (LVMPD). Their legal complaint alleges that LVMPD executed a welfare check at their home despite no one having expressed concern for their well-being, raising eyebrows about the necessity and appropriateness of such a police action.

The Allegations of Elder Abuse

The Yenovkians allege that the welfare check was merely a pretext for police to illegally enter their residence in search of their son. This led to an intense and frightening encounter for the elderly couple, who reported feeling intimidated and humiliated by the police presence. In a bizarre turn of events, they claim that police officers only left their home once they were compelled to stand visibly in the window so the officers could see them.

The Fallout and Eviction Notice

Just five days following the welfare check, the Yenovkians shockingly received an eviction notice, leaving them in a precarious situation. They are now seeking $25 million in damages from LVMPD, citing allegations of elder abuse, fabrication of evidence, and violations of their Fourth Amendment rights, which guard against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Community Reactions and Police Response

The unfolding drama has not only caught the attention of the media but has also ignited conversations within the local community regarding police practices during welfare checks. The LVMPD has refrained from commenting on the lawsuits currently pending, opting for silence amid the growing scrutiny of their operations.

What’s Next?

As the legal battle progresses, both the Miller family and the Yenovkians are left to navigate the unsettling aftermath of events that have turned their lives upside down. The arrest and subsequent police actions have raised significant questions regarding the balance between law enforcement authority and individual rights. How this will play out in court remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: both families are determined to stand up for what they believe is right as they seek justice in a bewildering situation.